Tenth annual Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare:
Four out of five companies have policies in place, but the food industry must move faster to deliver meaningful welfare impacts
London, Vienna, 16 March 2022: The tenth annual Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW) report, launched today, reveals that while companies continue to invest in animal welfare, they are too slow in delivering meaningful welfare impacts on the ground.
BBFAW – the leading global measure of policy commitment, performance and disclosure on animal welfare in food companies – is supported by founding partner, Compassion in World Farming and supporting partner, FOUR PAWS and is designed to help drive higher farmed animal welfare standards in the world’s leading food businesses and provide a benchmark to inform investor choices.
The 2021 report reveals that of the 150 companies evaluated:
- 134 (89%) now acknowledge farmed animal welfare as a business issue (compared to 71% of the 68 companies evaluated in 2012)
- 122 companies (81%) have formal policies on farmed animal welfare (compared to 46% of companies in 2012)
- 119 companies (79%) have published formal objectives and targets for animal welfare (compared to just 26% of companies in 2012).
- The benchmark’s top tier comprises two food retailers and two food producers – Marks and Spencer, Waitrose, Noble Foods, and Premier Foods.
Despite these positive outcomes, the new BBFAW Impact Rating introduced in 2021 – where companies are ranked A-F on the 10 performance impact questions – shows that the implementation of animal welfare improvements continues to lag policies and governance. For example, while the most widely reported performance impact data relates to cage- free production for laying hens – where 88 companies (59%) report some data – only 23 companies (15%) report that 60% or more of the laying hens in their global supply chains are cage-free.
There remains a stark disconnect between many companies’ disclosure of management processes and the subsequent impact on farmed animal welfare in their supply chains. None of the evaluated companies achieved an ’A’ Impact Rating and only five companies – Greggs PLC, Marks & Spencer PLC, Noble Foods, Premier Foods PLC, and Waitrose – achieved a ‘B’ Impact Rating. This indicates that companies are declaring improved welfare impacts for a significant proportion of farmed animals in their global supply chains. In fact, 85% of the 150 companies evaluated achieve an ‘E’ or ‘F’ Impact Rating, suggesting that these companies are failing to demonstrate improved welfare impacts for farmed animals in their global supply chains.
The 2021 benchmark doubled down on companies’ Performance Reporting and Impact by increasing the weighting of this section to 45% of the total score available. This increased focus on impact resulted in 36 companies dropping a tier. However, given the scale of changes introduced in 2021, it is noteworthy that six companies improved their score sufficiently to increase their ranking by one tier.
Hannah Baker
Head of Communications UK020 7922 7954
07966 032 235
7 - 14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR
FOUR PAWS UK